Category Archives: Yleinen

Lord of the Flies

Lord of the Flies is a renowed classic by William Golding, published in 1954. It’s his first novel, and has received multiple awards, for example the Nobel Prize. The book may be described as allegorical novel, since it tells a story about group of British boys who have stranded on a desolated, trophical island. With no grown-ups on the island, they tried to establish rules and goals, which didn’t work out for the boys and they became literal savages.

Ralph was one of the main characters, being the protagonist. He was voted to be the Chief and make the important decisions. Ralph expected to be rescued shortly, and not to be on the island forever. They decided to make a fire and keep it up the whole time for the passing ships to see them. However there was a large difference between the boys and it became impossible for Ralph to keep the boys together and do the things agreed in an assembly.

Piggy was another important character. The rest of the boys didn’t place much value on him: he was obese, had an asthma, accent, specs and avoided physical labour. Yet he had very valuable opinions and was a dear companion of Ralph. Also his specs were the only way a fire can be lit.

Jack Merridew can be called the antagonist: he and the rest of the choir were the Hunters, fetching meat for the others. He felt as if the island was a game, and didn’t want to be rescued as badly as Ralph. There was a clear conflict between the protagonist and the antagonist: Ralph favoured common sense and keeping the fire going, whereas Jack preferred the brilliant world of hunting together and exploring.

From this on, several crisises occurred which ultimately led to the total collapse of the British boys’ moral, common sense and brotherhood. Most important one was the scattering to two camps: Jack’s party and Ralph’s party. It is evident that Jack’s party was all about hunting, savagery and having fun. On the other hand, Ralph stuck to his guns and refused to act like a savage, tried to convince everybody that the fire was the most important thing. Following after this, on the heat of the moment, the boys together commited one of the bloodiest acts, which I wish to not spoil. Towards the climax, killing continues, more gruesome acts are done and it seems that all the British knowledge and morals the boys had, vanished on the island. Fast-approaching climax is bloody, warsome, exciting and devastating.

Even though William Golding managed to create very interesting and compelling plot, still his language and the milieu are very beautifully written and described. He doesn’t outright take the reader into excitement and folly, there were also some very harmonious moments and at first the island seemed like a nice place, where I longed to be at. At times, the boys experienced the great feeling of truly belonging in a group, and they had certain goals, aiming to accomplish them. Lastly, the island and the story are convincing and very realistic, despite being fiction.

Story is told more like looking trough the characters’ eyes and expressing their thoughts, portraying the events by how they see. That’s why there are many hidden meanings and if not reading carefully, reader may misunderstand a point. Sometimes the narrator is omniscient, revealing major details which the boys have no idea of. William’s writing style is very pleasing, and he succeeded in creating a rich world and great characters.

In conclusion, I am grateful for reading such an awesome book. Lord of the Flies deserves its place as a classic. The theme of the book is the disintegration of the boys’ little society and darkness of man’s heart. I felt compassionate for the characters, and couldn’t understand why the story reached such a tragic climax. Afterwards, it seemed like the boys were having a game, but without adults and took it much too seriously.I will keep the book close to my heart, since the questions Lord of the Flies raises, are very relevant to this day.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Novels, Yleinen

The last house on the left

The last house on the left is a 2009 american horror movie directed by Dennis Iliadis and written by Carl Ellsworth and Adam Alleca. It’s a remake of the 1972 movie of the same name. The film follows the parents of Mari Collingwood (Sara Paxton), who want to revenge to a group of strangers led by Krug (Garret Dillahunt), that have taken shelter at their home during a thunderstorm. Maris parents discover that Krug and his group have raped and shot their daughter and left her for dead.

The story is about revenge of parents. They are willing to do anything they can, to hurt those criminals who hurt their daughter.  It had a good, simple plot and had only few raw scenes in it. It was almost like splitted into two parts: to the horror-part and to the  psychological thriller. The second part was rather violent and agonizing. It didn’t feel good to watch the innocent young people to be hurt.  It almost made me stop watching the movie. The violence was raw but not visual. The actors were quite good, they did their best, but their roles were superficial.

Something interesting in the plot made me watch forward. But the detailed violent scenes were too much and as said, those roles were so shallow. The last house on the left is middle class movie with some good turns and rather interesting actors. But it didn’t make me want to watch that film again. It had nothing to give.

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Yleinen

NIGHTMARE – Painajainen merellä (Nightmare At The Sea)

I watched Nightmare At The Sea few days ago, when it came to TV. I had heard this movie is so bad and boring, so I thought I wanna see is it really so so bad. This movie was released in 2012 and it was directored by Marko Äijö. Nightmare At The Sea is thriller, despite the fact that it is advertised as a horror movie. This movie is “part” of Salatut Elämät – television serie, even if the plot is not directly related to the series.

In movie  Peppi  (Sara Säkkinen), her  new husband Sergei (Tero Tiittanen) and their friends leaving on a cruise. On cruise  weird stuff starts to happen and  friends begin to disappear.  The situation becomes horrible and old friends are beginning to turn against. Environment is St. Peter Line’s cruise liner Princess Maria. The film was shot during the summer and particularly at first everything was sunny and okay.  Main characters are exactly Peppi and Sergei, but important characters are for example Heidi (Venla Savikuja), Joonatan  (Markku Pulli), Sampo (Sampsa Tuomala) and cruise hostess Tessa (Karoliina Blackburn). Movie ‘s theme song is “Kyynel kuuluu mereen” by Vague Musik featuring Karoliina Kallio.

My first impression after seeing this movie was “what?” This movie wasn’t thiller at all, it was a bad comedy. I don’t know which character I could identify with, because movie was quite unconvincing. Characters or whole movie weren’t so plausible. This movie confirmed my opinion that the Finnish films aren’t often very good. I don’t know what was the purpose of the work. I think somebody thought “I want to make movie”. I would recommend the film to people who are angry or disappointed, because this movie is so bad it is almost good. You can’t help laughing during this “horror or thriller movie”. Language was rather standard language and it was okay to hear. Movie was quite easy to follow. I don’t know what I would have done differently – maybe almost everything.

1 Comment

Filed under Yleinen

The Wolf of Wall Street

Martin Scorsese directed a true story based film of Jordan Belfort  (acted by Leonardo DiCaprio)  who was born to an original middle class family in Queens, New York. Only few years after Jordan had had his 20th birthday, he got a stockbroker job in Wall Street. That lead him to the world of big and also illegal moneys, luxury life and drugs.

The Wolf of Wall Street were released at the end of 2013 in USA and in Finland at the start of 2014. Right from the start it has been a great success and for instance the heartbeat of movie life IMDb has given to this crime/comedy genre film a perfect rating (8,7/10). The Wolf of Wall Street includes a high-class cast with DiCaprio. For example Jonah Hill as a Jordan’s business partner Donnie Azoff and Margot Robbie as a Naomi Lapaglia (Jordan’s wife).

Every stockbroker knows the term Black Monday in Wall Street. A huge one-day percentage decline in recorded stock market history. Jordan Belfort was having his first day as a real stockbroker and immediately he losed his job because of this stock market crash. He didn’t give up and found himself selling shares that were not in stock. After selling them a while he gather up a team and created own company Stratton Oakmont which gave to him and to his team a highway to the stars.

Drugs came to their lives. Also partys all the time and a prostitute for every night guaranteed a life that these men’s had wanted. Sad but true, most of the stories are not only for flying top of the clouds. Also in this case it had lots of turbulence. Jordan were suspected from many crimes for example stock market manipulation. Many things lead to another so it didn’t end how it started…

3 hours watching Wolf of Wall Street in cinema wasn’t too much at all, every minute was a pleasure to view. Okay, maybe there were few scenes during the movie when I supposed that it’s gonna end now. Leonardo DiCaprio made an excellent work as a Jordan Belfort, because he has the skill to make it feel so real. Also the story made you feel like you could be the main character (from normal family to world of richness by your own). I enjoyed the most from the parts where the whole Stratton Oakmont were selling shares with great team spirit and attitude.

Like allways, movie is made to make a profit and famous to it’s company, actors, directors and etc… This movie anyways told a good story about good sides, but also dark sides of life. Everyone who loves business life and good entertainment are the ones who should see The Wolf of Wall Street.

 

1 Comment

Filed under Films / theatre, Yleinen

Batman begins

After the Warner Bros’ quest to kill Batman failed, Christopher Nolan decided to take the character and use it as a weapon of social criticism. Hence the name, Nolan starts from a clean slate. Here’s the story: a rich married couple gets mugged and killed with one of their kin left behind. This kid, left with the enormous heritage, grows up with the trauma and vengeance for injustice. He determines to fight crime as the Caped Crusader. More than a cop, more than a lawyer. He becomes an idea. He inspires all the cops and lawyers to stand up against the vile underground.

Bruce, portrayed by Christian Bale, sees beyond the criminals’ dirty deeds. He sees a rotten society. Nolan now shows what are the causes of great differences in income. The city of Gotham is corrupted for good, because no one who is capable of changing things doesn’t care.

Bruce Wayne travels to east. While he’s doing some jail time, a representative of fan favourite Ra’s al Ghul meets him. The representative, named Henri Ducard, trains Bruce to become a member of the League of Shadows, which has been fighting the corrupt since the 1500-century in the DC Comics universe. This quote from Ra’s al Ghul frames his perception of justice well: ”When a forest grows too wild, a purging fire is inevitable and natural.” Bruce refuses to execute a murderer as a ritual to committing to justice. Then he also learns that the League of Shadows is set out to destroy Gotham for all it’s corruption. Bruce doesn’t accept it. This can be seen as against to capital punishment, when Bruce decides to give Gotham another chance and protect it. He destroys the building leaving only Henri Ducard behind.

He gets the equipment for badassery from the Wayne enterprises conveniently at the same time when he discovers the bat cave to dump all that equipment to. The storyline starts to wrap up: Ra’s al Ghul, who was actually disguised as Henri Ducard has been dumping lethal hallucinogen into drinking water. But, the poison in liquid form isn’t functional. That’s why Falcone’s men steal a desert fighting weapon, that drains enemy’s water supply. It can vaporize Gotham’s sewers, and make the people breathe the poison in. Batman stops their plans while fighting Ra’s al Ghul. And just spitting out ever-memorable one-liners of course.

Hans Zimmer, as some might say, the master of horrifying movie music composed a score for this film. He uses the illustrious manners of building tension: repetition and volume. Zimmer’s way of adding structure and body to the simplest melody or idea will get your adrenaline pumping until your can not sit still.

”Why do we fall? So we can learn to pick ourselves up.” this quote by fictional character Thomas Wayne, Bruce Wayne’s dad, displays the uplifting side of this dark tale. It shows that even the most light hearted people can enjoy this movie and have something to relate to. With all these elements combined, this story works at every part in time. In the hands of a capable director of course.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Yleinen

The Last spin

The Last Spin

Evan Hunter’s short story ”The Last Spin”, is a story about two guys, Danny and Tigo, gang members of different gangs and they’re chosen to play a game called ”russian roulette” as a compromise. They both are enemies because they belong to other gangs, but as the story goes on, they’re starting to have a friendship after many things they are talking about. It all has a dramatic ending.

The message of the story is pretty much that you can be friend almost with everyone, you don’t have to judge people for what they for example believes into. In the story the point is that even people from different gangs can be friends and no-one can tell you what you must think about someone. You must have your own opinions.

In the story there is all-knowing narrator. By reading the story you can figure out that Danny is the protagonist by noticing that there is only told what Danny feels and nothing about Tigo’s feelings.

As a conclusion, I can say that the short story about two guys playing russian roulette is really dramatic but really nice to read as it is a really gripping and touching story. It can make you think about the life of some people in other countries.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Yleinen

Full Stop

I read Full Stop which is a short story written by Alecia McKenzie. The story consists of Grandma Scottie and her grandchild Carmen’s letters to each other. They live far away from each other so they have found a way to stay connected to each other by writing letters to exchange pleasantries.

Carmen and Grandma talk about their everyday lives by exchanging letters every once in a while. Eventually the conversation turns to Carmen’s real mother who is nothing more than a birth giver to her because of the fact that Grandma Scottie is the actual person who raised Carmen and her brother Richard. Carmen’s mother tries to contact her daughter but Carmen doesn’t want to face the woman who is like a complete stranger to her. When it comes to her mother Carmen feels abandoned and seems almost like bitter.

When getting no response to her communication attempts Carmen’s mother shows up in Carmen’s apartment. She tells Carmen her version of what happened – she and Carmen’s father had to give children up to under Grand Ma Scottie’s guardianship because they had no money. They moved in the UK to get employed and by the time they came back in the USA, their home country, Grandma actually refused to give the children up. Grandma broke the agreement she had made with the children’s parents.

Now it is in Carmen’s hands which story she chooses to believe. She still remains skeptic about her mother’s version but neither she is so sure about Grandma being truthful anymore. After her daughter showing up Grandma suddenly chances her action; she seems to go into her shell. Grandma finally agreeing to get the burglar bars reflects their relationship in a symbolic way. Burglar bars symbolize what Grandma starts to feel towards Carmen – she feels like she is isolated from Carmen now that also she has started to doubt her veracity.

I interpret Carmen as the story’s protagonist and Grand Ma Scottie as an antagonist – not actually meaning that the old apparently very religious lady is the villain of the story or anything but representing the opposite to her. Carmen’s character is a little naive and also really benevolent – she wants to protect her grandmother for example by sending her money to get somebody to put burglar bars over all the windows of hers in case of thieves. At first sight Grandma seems like an endearing old lady but in the end turns out she’s been lying about things in the past.

The story consisting fully of dialogue in the form of letters is an interesting solution from the writer. Grandma’s letters are illegible; she writes entirely without punctuation. Without full stop. I think the story title is chosen to represent what happened to Carmen and Grandma Scottie’s relationship. They receded from each other. No one really put the ”full stop” to their relationship but in the last letter Grandma seems to become distant.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Short Stories, Yleinen

Full Stop

The short story I read is called Full Stop, written by Alecia McKenzie. The short story is about correspondence between Carmen and her grandmother. They talk about Carmen’s real mother, grandmothers daughter, who didn’t raise Carmen and now wants to meet her.
The protagonists are Carmen and her grandmother, and antagonists are Carmen’s husband, which they talk about in their letters, Carmen’s brother and Carmen’s real mother.
In the short story you get to know Carmen and her grandmother personally and you can notice many things of them as persons.
Grandmother is a genuine Christian. In every letter she somehow brings up her faith in God. She appeals to God’s orders when she wants Carmen to do something, ”The Lord said, be fruitful and multiply”, ”Our saviour says to forgive and forget”. Grandmother seems to be a little bit silly what it comes to hands-on things. She relies way too much on her beliefs about Christianity. She doesn’t want to put burglar bars on her windows when there’s thieves moving around in her neighbourhood. She thinks God saves her from everything. Grandmother seems also a bit selfish and arrogant. She seems to think that the only right way to do things is her way. Also when Carmen says that she and her husband aren’t having babies yet Grandmother wants them to have them right away so she can see them before she is dead (which isn’t going to happen soon, according to the text). Grandmother thinks money is a way to measure how much your close-ones cares about you, for example when Carmen’s mom wrote to her but didn’t send ’a red cent’ and was upset about it. She thinks everyone else on the Island are thieves or unreliable, and doesn’t trust them or their work.
Carmen is nothing like her grandmother. She’s much more practical and smart. She doesn’t seem to so much of Christian. She’s used to her grandmothers behaviour because she deals with it calmly and doesn’t make a big deal of it. She still really cares of grandmother in spite of her personality. Maybe only because of duty.
The burglar bars may have a symbolic meaning in the story. Maybe grandmother thinks she’s isolated from Carmen and stuck in her own home if she puts them on her windows. And if she is stuck in her home she can’t control Carmen’s life and the development of Carmen’s and her mother’s relationship.
All in all the text takes a stance on Christianity and its extremity. Carmen’s grandmother is blinded by her faith in Christianity. She thinks God saves her from everything anytime ”God will protect me from evil”. As her faith on God grows, her faith in herself decreases ”Well I’m here still holding on, praying for a better way of living myself. We just have to keep hoping that our sweet Saviour helps us take each day one at a time”.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Yleinen

A Christmas carol

A Christmas carol is a novel written by Charles Dickens. It’s the story of Scrooge, an old and reach man who closed in himself and gave up with enjoying life. During the story he has some adventures that make him think about his life and he finds out the best way to spend the rest of his days.

I would say that Scrooge is both the protagonist and antagonist because of his behavior and there are three spirits who come to help him to go back to the right way. The narration is really precise and helps to get into the scenes. When the ghosts come inside the room you can hear every noise and feel the fear of seeing something coming in.

This book is a classic and I liked it and although it’s just a simple story it helps to think about life and how to make right use of what you have; maybe . It has been made into a movie for children so the most of the  have been softened, and I think that’s a pity because it would be good to take part to all the adventures to understand better who the evil man becomes the real protagonist.

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Yleinen

Pride and Prejudice

Pride and Prejudice was written by Jane Austen in the early 19th century, and is still really popular a novel.  The book’s main target audience is probably anyone interested in romantic English literature, and it is surprisingly anarchistic considering its publishing year. The opening almost makes the reader believe the book’s main character would be Jane who is going to get married to polite and charming Mr Bingley, but instead the author chooses smart and levelheaded Elizabeth to be the protagonist. Elizabeth Bennet and Mr Darcy’s romance can be seen also as a comment on the rigid social norms of Victorian England’s class society,  which is also the book’s setting and context.

The name ”Pride and Prejudice” comes from the moment when rational and cold Mr Darcy proposes to Elizabeth, he has to forget his pride of being of upper social class and to forget his prejudices about members of lower class. This was quite rare in Austen’s times, so the book surprised its audience with ironic depiction of the upper class’ efforts to get married (often to ensure wealth or inheritance).

The book starts when wealthy Mr Bingley moves into Netherfield Park, and Mrs Bennet, who has five single daughters, wants to make his acquaintance, mostly to set one of her daughters to marry him, and to introduce her daughters to high society. But when one of the Bennet Sisters, Jane, dances with Mr Bingley, the interest of the rest of the sisters is drawn by handsome and even more wealthy but unpleasant and rude Mr Darcy.

The story of Pride and Prejudice is told from Elizabeth’s view, but its narrated by a third person omniscient narrator. The language is sometimes a bit complicated, mostly due to the fact the book was published in 1813. The book criticizes slightly the Victorian society norms and shallow view of marriage as a part of a business or a transaction, while maintaining its bright attitude.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Yleinen