Fast and furious 6

I chose Fast and furious 6 because it’s the latest fast and furious movie and I liked it a lot. It’s been around about 2 years but I watched it two months ago. I really enjoyed the movie since it’s sequel to Fast and Furious 5 and it had similar plot. The story continues from ending of Fast and furious 5. But this time agent Hobbs doesn’t chase them but asks for Dominic’s teams help. In Europe there is criminal gang that tries to get hands on the very powerful weapon. Together Hobbs and Dominic tries to stop their plans and in return Dominic wants everyone get their record clear. Hobbs has no chance but to accept this.

What I have experienced from watching this series I have seen that Fast and furious 5 and 6 has been little bit different from earlier movies. The main focus is not anymore in these super-tuned cars but in action that doesn’t contain so much racing with cars. First and second movie was all about tuning and racing with cars. I’m not saying it’s bad to change focus away from cars but it was the original idea of the series. Though it’s good to have different style of movie. It brings a welcome change.

Movie itself is very action-packed, humorous and very well made. Soundtrack is epic and special effects hasn’t been spared. Actors are almost the same as in Fast and furious 5 so if you haven’t seen Fast and furious 5 it doesn’t really matter. Paul Walker and Vin Diesel has been almost in every Fast and Furious movie so they are very well known.

Overall I think that this isn’t the best Fast and Furious movie but it’s still very good. I recommend this movie to those who wants to see action and fast cars. Movie contains violence and swearing and it’s age rating is 12.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Films / theatre

The Lone Ranger

I chose the movie ”The Lone Ranger” because I have seen it a couple of times before and I really like it. Also I haven’t really watched movies for a while and this was the last movie I watched. The Lone Ranger is a western style comedy adventure that takes place in America released in 2013 so it’s not a really old movie. The film also has some unrealistic aspects such as returning from the dead, but it just adds to the story. The two main characters are John Reid, played by Armie Hammer and Indian by the name of Tonto, played by Johnny Depp. Of course the film is a comedy. It has Johnny Depp in it! Anyway the plot is quite simple and without major spoilers I can say: The good guys try to take revenge on the bad guys and whack them with the glorious Hammer of Justice. I really like the Indian and Gunslinger combination. It gives the movie something that makes it different from the other generic western films.

The technical parts of the movie are well done, if you can say so. The camera angles are quite funny sometimes and makes the movie more action-packed. There is always a right type of music in the right place and there is not many dull moments in the movie. So effects though, like a train sliding, don’t look that well made, but who am I to say that, I haven’t seen a train sliding myself. Overall the special effects were really good.

I think the movie was really good. I was surprised to see that it was a Disney film too. I guess they don’t only do cartoons or animations anymore. The movie was funny and well done. I’d love to see a sequel, but I doubt that we’ll see one.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Films / theatre

Witcher – The Last Wish

Andrzej Sapkowski, Witcher saga (Polish 1993, English 2007)

 

We had a task to read a book on our current English course so I immediately started brainstorming my choice. I have to admit I’m not really into books. From time to time I pick up an interesting book, read it through with just few pauses and then forget about books for a while. But there’s one specific book series which keeps pulling me back. The Witcher.

Andrzej Sapkowski is a Polish fantasy writer. And what kind of fantasy! While not yet popular world-wide his books are praised by reviews and readers.  His books blow your stereotypes about fantasy worlds into little pieces. Forget about shiny white knights prancing around saving princesses and “literally devil” enemies. People in Sapkowski’s world are dirty and two-faced. Sounds like life, doesn’t it. There isn’t clear white and black. There’s just grey. Many shades of it. This fantasy world with no name owes much to Polish history and Slavic mythology.

Geralt of Rivia is blessed to be the protagonist of the series. Being loyal to book’s name Geralt is a witcher.  Monster-hunter who has received special training and had his body modified at an early age to provide him with unnatural abilities. Thus he can take on dangerous monsters while not getting himself killed. Many witchers die during the modifications and Geralt seems to be one of the few hunters alive. Witchers in Geralt’s world live difficult time. No monsters seem to terrorize people’s peace since most of them have been slain. Hunters are now just seen as cold-blooded killers with no real meaning. Geralt also is not living easy life, wandering from town to town looking for a job.

The book itself is actually a collection of short stories telling about Sapkowski’s first stories where Geralt appeared. A book begins with frame story and flashbacks are told when Geralt meditates. Sapkowski has managed to make world oddly natural. People are living their life and not wanting to be part of others’ businesses. Geralt is a person who can be related to. He doesn’t know right or wrong, he only does what must be done. It is ultimately really hard to tell what makes the book so appealing. Maybe you should find out.

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under arvosteltu, Yleinen

Grimm

Grimm is television series that is shooted in America and the story itself happens in America also. In my opinion the series combines two of the best genres in tv-series, criminal investigation and fantasy. Story takes place in city of Portland in state of Oregon.  Main character Nick Burkhardt is homicide investigator at Portland Police Department and in addition of solving crimes hes also carrying mysterious power that affects greatly on hes life and everyone around him. Theres few side-characters, Hank Griffin, Nicks homicide partner, Juliette Silverton, Nicks girlfriend, Monroe, Nicks friend and also one of them and last but not least Captain Sean Renard, Nicks boss and also one of them. Theres also several other smaller roles in the series but its tv-series so what did you expect? Most of the time Nick is trying to solve homicides but hes confused with weird ways people have been killed. So yeah, sounds pretty basic murder investigation-series but i told you theres some fantasy in it too.

Nick has ability to see the other ”side” of the people he meets, that is revealed by strong emotions, usually anger or fear. People who have same ability are called as Grimm and the count of grimms stays unknown if there even is anyone else. Grimm needs to keep balance between humans and wesens and that should go pretty well as a police officer or does it? People with ”other side” are called Wesen that means creature in German. Not all people have this side, but those few that does are usually met by having a part in crime Nick is investigating. Wesens are kind of animals with small touch of imagination making them look even better. Wesens usually have special abilities like poison, night vision or huge amount of strength. In series Nick has to face problems like dealing with wesens and still going by the law book and keeping hes secret as a secret. There is also group called ”Royals” who are royals of the wesen and they bring some pressure on Nick too. Later on the series two new groups are introduced, Verrat and opposing force named Resistance. Verrat is working for the Royals and theyre using deadly force to succeed in their missions given by Royals. Resistance is in war with Verrat but theyre still trying to make it work out between Royals to make order stay in the world. Both sides have similarities like all the members are wesen and theyre killing each other.

When Grimm was launched in Finland 8.1.2013 at Sub i were very excited about it because it was one of the best tv-series for a while. Fantasy is always been my thing but i dont like ”boring fantasy” like Once Upon Time that i think it doesnt have the action needed to interest me. What makes Grimm so good is probably never ending twiststorm. If youre going to watch the series you should be prepared for dramatic, annoying and exciting twists everywhere.  I recommend watching Grimm to anyone who likes fantasy or crime shows and who like to see some action with troublesome situations.

Leave a Comment

Filed under arvosteltu

The Maze Runner

The Maze Runner is an American science fiction action thriller directed by Wes Ball. The 2014 film is based on a 2009 novel of the same name by James Dashner. The screenplay of the film was written by Noah Oppenheim, Grant Pierce Myers, and T.S. Nowlin. The film, which was produced by Ellen Goldsmith-Vein, Wyck Godfrey, Marty Bowen, and Lee Stollman, is the first installment of The Maze Runner film series. Dylan O’Brien, Kaya Scodelario, Thomas Brodie-Sangster, and Will Poulter belong to the leading actors of the film.

The plot of this film is exciting and inventive but it doesn’t seem really out of the ordinary to me. By this I’m pointing at recently released films like The Hunger Games and Divergent. The Maze Runner tells about Thomas (Dylan O’Brien), a 16-year-old boy who finds himself trapped inside a huge maze with a band of other teenager boys. Once in every month an elevator brings a new boy with some supplies to an area called the Glade surrounded by tall stone walls. Anyone of the boys doesn’t seem to remember anything from their past, except their own name. They have created a working society and at the same time tried to find an escape from their prison. Each morning an entrance opens revealing the mysterious ever-changing maze. The boys, who call themselves Gladers, know that the only way to escape is to go through the maze. The runners spend their days exploring the maze for an escape. They have to get back before night-time when the entrance closes. No one has ever survived alive a night in the maze.

I didn’t go to the movie theatre to see this film, but I guess that if had done it, I would probably have seen a big amount of other teenagers in the audience. It’s clear that The Maze Runner was filmed for getting teenagers to watch it. This kind of fantasy films that usually take place in the future are a trend among teenagers and young adults. The casting of this film only strengthens my theory. As an 18-year-old girl I can’t say that I didn’t enjoy watching the good-looking young actors.

My opinion is that the cast was chosen successfully. Most of the actors weren’t nice to watch only because of their looks. Despite their young age they seemed to be experienced enough to make the characters and the action scenes plausible. My absolutely favorite parts of the film were the action scenes. The leading actor Dylan O’Brien, who is known for co-starring in the TV series Teen Wolf, did a good job playing the role of Thomas, the most important character in the film. Other great performance was given by Will Poulter playing the role of the “bad guy” Gally. Poulter manages in making his character seem irritatingly defiant and a bit arrogant. I also want to mention Thomas Brodie-Sangster, who is known for his role in the popular TV series Game of Thrones. His performance as Newt, the friendly and helpful boy, made me long for a bigger and more important role for the character. It was a pity that at the same time the film moved forward, Newt’s role became more and more meaningless.

The Maze Runner’s problems are the ordinary characters and plot, I think. The film contains all the same characters as every teenager fantasy film that I have seen. First, there’s the hero of the film. The hero is always nothing special but at the same time so brave, original, and oh, so hard for other people to understand. Of course the hero has to have a couple of sympathetic and faithful friends to stand behind their back. Then there’s the cocky “bad guy”. At the beginning of the film I was wondering where all the girls were. Everyone knows that you can’t make a good film for teenagers without having any girls or signs of romance in it. Luckily this problem was solved when the elevator suddenly brought a beautiful brunette, Teresa (Kaya Scodelario), to the Glade.

I am not a huge film enthusiast, and therefore I would probably have never watched The Maze Runner, if I wouldn’t have been visiting my sister’s place, and wouldn’t have had anything better to do one night. After watching the film my first thoughts were that the ending left many questions in my head and that the film hadn’t been as scary as I expected. I can’t recall thinking anything about the music used in the film, so I guess it wasn’t too bad or too good to make me notice it. One thing that bothered me was how slowly the film moved forward.

I would recommend The Maze Runner to those people who are interested in these kinds of fictional fantasy action films, and of course to those who just enjoy watching good-looking young men. Personally I’m not quite sure whether I liked the film or didn’t like it. Overall I found The Maze Runner interesting enough to make me want to see the upcoming sequels.

1 Comment

Filed under Films / theatre

Titanic

Titanic is directed by James Cameron and on it´s soundtrack is one of the most famous songs of all time; Celine Dion´s ”My heart will go on”. In leading roles of the film are Kate Winslet and Leonardo di Caprio. They are both very fascinating and skilful actors, who don´t leave no one cold. I think that the main reason which makes the film so touching is simply the actors. They play their roles so perfect. Titanic´s characters are fictionally but the film is based on true events. Titanic has broken many records. It has won eleven Oscars for example. It was also the first film which box-office was more than billion dollars.

Now I will tell you briefly the plot of the film. 17-year-old Rose steps into the ship with her mother Ruth and her future fiancé Cal. Mother  convinces Rose how important the marriage with Cal is, but Rose doesn´t love him and she even considers suicide by jumping from the stern. Third-class passenger Jack stops her and this time tragedy is avoided. Rose demands that they have to ask Jack to dine with them at the following evening. That´s the least they can do. After that Jack and Rose are meeting secretly and step by step they are falling in love. Eventually Jack even draws a picture from Rose in which she wears only a precious diamond necklace, Cal´s gift to her. Cal and mother Ruth are furious about that. Chaos begins when the ship hits the iceberg. People are screaming and the lifeboats are filling. Rose refuses to get to the lifeboat with her mother. Instead she jumps back to the sinking ship, because she wants to be with Jack, no matter what! The fight for staying alive begins. The ship sinks, people are floating in the frozen and dark sea, among others, also Jack and Rose. Hundred´s of people are dying, also Jack. Rose survives barely, but she can´t never forget Jack. Rose get´s her freedom and she never meets Cal again. She lives her life carrying these memories in her heart.
Titanic is the best film, I have ever seen!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Films / theatre

Knots and Crosses

Knots and Crosses is a crime novel written by Ian Rankin in 1987. It is the first of many books in the Inspector Rebus series. John Rebus is a somewhat alcoholic, Scottish detective with a past of troubles. The series originally had 17 books. In the last one titled ”Exit Music”, Rebus retires. Though later on two more books were published, mainly focused around a new character, but in which John Rebus is still present as a civilian working with the police to help on cases.

 

The story of the book is very interesting. It seems, in lack of a better term, multileveled. This is due to a lot of things happening simultaneously, though they are all connected. The plot is based around an investigation of the abduction and strangling of two young girls. On the side there is also Rebus’ brother’s drug dealing, which was discovered by a journalist Jim Stevens, who suspects that John may be in the know and even support his brother’s legal activities. the plot thickens as Rebus’ former wife is attacked and his daughter kidnapped. His brother must use hypnotism to have Rebus’ to spill his past, especially his work in the SAS. Ultimately Rebus is relieved from duty due to his personal involvement in the case. After which he goes rogue to chase down his enemies.

 

The book is very intriguing with it’s extremely descriptive style of text. The characters seem real and relatable, which makes it a pleasant read. Since it is the debut John Rebus novel, it does a great job introducing the characters and the world in all it’s ruthlessness. Character development was also good, subtle, yet noticeable. the book felt purposeful, in the way that everything that happened seemed plausible, yet all of it carried the plot further. This, of course, is due to Ian Rankin’s what appears to be God given talent as an author, given that Knots and Crosses was only his second book. And in my opinion, a very good one at that.

 

All and all, a fun, exciting, a bit thrilling journey in the form of a book. Warmly suggest to anyone interested in the world of crime novels. It was such a nice read, I will definitely be continuing this series onwards 🙂

Leave a Comment

Filed under arvosteltu, Novels

Lavinia

Ursula K. Le Guin: Lavinia (2008)

When I found out we’d be reading books in this course, it came to my mind that I could finally read a Le Guin book in English. I’ve read several of her books in Finnish but surprisingly not a single one in the original language. So which book would I choose?

Ursula Kroeber Le Guin (born in 1929) published her first books in the 1960´s and became famous mainly for her fantasy and science-fiction novels, though she also has writen children´s books, poems, and essays. Especially in her science-fiction books, she creates completely new worlds and cultures with diverse people and nations. Even though I’m a huge fan of her fantasy novels (Eartsea, Annals of the Western Shore etc.), I decided to go with Lavinia.

Lavinia is sligthly diffirent from other books by Le Guin, for it is based on Greco-Roman mythology; Vergil´s epic poem Aeneid. The poem tells us the story of the birth of Rome and its founder, Aeneas.

Aeneid was written between 29 and 19BC, when Rome was dealing with major changes in social and political structures. Thus , the new emperor, Augustus Caesar, decided that it was time to re-introduce the traditional Roman values, which the Aeneid did, as it describes the heroic and loyal Aeneas fighting for the ”New Troy” in the west, as gods had informed him to do.

Aeneas was originally in Iliad and fought in the war of Troy: Vergil simply took this minor character and continued his story. Similarly to Odysseus, Aeneas flees from Troy and ends up sailing the Mediterranean searching for a place for the new capital. Years later he lands on the shore of Laurentum, where the story of Lavinia begins.

Just like Vergil, Le Guin takes a minor character and continues, or in Lavinia´s case, widens their story. In the Aeneid, Lavinia is hardly mentioned, but still Le Guin manages to create a whole life for her.

Lavinia (the princess of Laurentum) is quiet and modest person, as opposed to her counterpart in Iliad,the beautiful queen Helen of Troy. She loses both her brothers at a very young age, which traumatises her and her mother, Amata, who begins to despise her only surviving child. As her mother can’t stand looking at her more than a few moments, she turns to her father, who teaches her about politics and religious seremonies, despite that she can never inherit his crown.

Turnus, the first suitor of Lavinia, is the king of a neighbouring city. Lavinia can’t really say how she feels about him. In fact, she doesn’t have to make up her mind, because Aeneas kills him. Simple.

In spite off being the protagonist of the original story, Aeneas’s character is very, very shallow. The only things we actually know about him are told by Lavinia, he only seems to live inside of her. There is nothing to grasp, which is understandable, because a strong figure might have taken the spotlight away from Lavinia.

This could also represent their entire relationship: when they get married, she is half of his age (she’s 20 and Aeneas is about 40), so even if Lavinia does love her husband, her perspective might be a bit naive (I’m by no means implying that being twenty means that you’d be naive, but Lavinia is, for sure).

Le Guin also wrote Vergil in the story, as impossible as it may sound. He is almost done writing Aeneid, but gets seriously ill, and in his last moments he somehow finds Lavinia, and Lavinia finds him, although there is atleast a thousand-year gap between their lifetimes.

Well, Vergil does speak to Lavinia and tells her about her fate (marrying Aeneas, the mighty founder of Rome). They meet often before Vergil’s death, and then Aeneas already sails to the bay of Laurentum.

Vergil’s part in the novel is crucial. Even though the narrator is Lavinia, Le Guin makes it clear that Vergil is the writer. Because of this, the reader questions if Lavinia even exists. Maybe the whole book is about Vergil’s last thoughts as he clings to one of the least important characters in his unfinished story.

Le Guin’s text is always a bit tricky to read at first, even in Finnish. But after the first chapters reading becomes mostly automatic, apart from oldish vocabulary Le Guin seems to love (I checked about 15 words, which is about 3 times more than usually).

Lavinia is not a light novel. It’s sad, at some points. Lavinia has to bury not only her husband, but her child too. Amata commits suicide. Turnus is killed. All of this combined propably makes the book a bit too heavy for some readers, but Le Guin has never tried to write ”fluffy texts”. All of her books are filled with psycologial journeys inside of people, their beliefs, memories, and sexuality. And the beauty of life itself.

Wonderfully confusing and delicious, I’d recommend this to anyone who likes fantasy. Or Ursula Le Guin. Or books in general. You don’t have to know anything about Roman history to read Lavinia.

Like Aeneas is Lavinia’s imagination, and Lavinia is Vergil’s, and Vergil is Le Guin’s, perhaps the whole book is mine. Perhaps I wrote this without reading the book at all. Maybe the book doesn’t even exist. You got to go find it out.

Leave a Comment

Filed under arvosteltu, Novels

Alice in Wonderland

Alice in Wonderland is a prose written by Lewis Carroll, originally Charles Lutwidge Dodgson, in 1865. He was an English author but also a mathematician and logician. Since child Carroll loved writing novels and poems (most of them being funny or satirical). Later on he became a mathematician professor but still continued to write all kinds of texts. Under the name of Lewis Carroll he wrote his most recognizable books Alice in Wonderland and it’s sequel Through the Looking Glass which both tell about Alice’s adventures in Wonderland.

Alice’s adventures in  Wonderland has a theme of overcoming the difficulties of childhood and becoming an adult. At first Alice is a crybaby who cries over things way too easily but as I continued reading she made a lot of progress and became more mature and capable of holding her own against the illogical things in Wonderland. The book is an obvious fantasy and fairy tail story which includes talking animals, normally impossible things like growing and shrinking while eating or drinking something and much more ”curiouser and curiouser” coincidences. Alice in Wonderland is a book one of a kind and none of the books I’ve read haven’t had worlds as surreal. Still novels like Harry Potter by J. K. Rowling and Inkheart by Cornelia Funke give the same kind of thrilling feeling in which you just want to continue reading.

The main character of Alice in Wonderland is Alice, a young girl living in England. She is a daydreamer who loves to show of her knowledge. From many parts of the book the reader can spot parts in which explains Alice’s large imagination. Despite her quick temper she’s still very polite, honest and sweet. She is a perfect image of a well educated little girl from a well earning family. On the other hand Alice is well portrayed by her personality, her appearance isn’t being mentioned in the story. If there wouldn’t be any pictures, a first timer wouldn’t really have much clue about her looks.

I have read quite a few books in English but none of them had included poems or so. ”Carroll plays with linguistic conventions in Alice in Wonderland, making use of puns and playing on multiple meanings of words throughout the text”, is well said. He uses Alice’s confusion in advance and plays with all kinds of words which were at some places quite hard to understand. Plus Carroll loved poems and used them with delight. He also used a bit old fashioned language and sentences (well, the story was written in the 17th century). As for the narrator in Alice in Wonderland it is omniscient. The narrator tells thoroughly what Alice thinks or does but doesn’t follow other characters as closely.

For a short story Alice in Wonderland took me some time to read. I have, for a long, wanted to read this book but haven’t had the cuts to loan it. It was nice to see from where my favorite Disney Princess movie had had it’s beginning. I think I overestimated the book and were a bit disappointed when finished. Still Alice’s adventures is a classic which I recommend to everyone, young and old.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Yleinen

Lord of the flies

William Golding, 1954

 

This is a book about a group of schoolboys wrecked in an unhabited, tropical island, who struggle trying to survive while there’s no rescuer in sight. But at the same time it’s a book about society, war, democracy, autocracy, adulthood, violence and human nature. With all these issues on the table, it is intangible how William Golding, a Nobel Prize-winning English author, has managed to deal with them with such lightness and simplicity.

It’s the age of the Second World War. The world is in chaos but it’s sincerely silent and tranquil on the island. The only exception in the serenity are the lost schoolboys who landed there due to an airplane accident. One of the boys, by the name of Ralph, finds a pure white conch and decides to summon all the boys to an assembly. Soon he’s chosen to be the Chief. Things start well as the children work devotedly together, but as the time flies, some boys begin to disagree on some shared rules. Conflicts are born, fear grows and on every one’s mind is a doubt if they’ll ever get back home again.

First a few words about the plot. I hadn’t heard much about it in advance though Lord of the Flies is a well-known peace of literature. Therefore I expected to be excited and surprised by the twists and turns of the storyline. Instead I was to find myself yawning in a neverending state of boredom – at least it felt like it!

I was greatly disappointed in the events of this book which roughly didn’t even exist. Where the boys were described arguing or eating or bathing or dreaming, I was left to long for more action. On the other hand the book was filled with talented narration and description of the milieu. Unfortunately my linguistic talents of English weren’t quite enough to grasp that (And the time was too short for using the dictionary with so many difficult words in a row!) Still, it’s never a good sign if one has to force herself to reading a book.

Golding’s writing is polished and finely tuned. Particularly impressing were the lines of the boys. The children spoke very plainly and abruptly which was convincing but also frustrating for it made the story a lot harder to follow. Although I have to admit that the confusingly random and sudden comments were as funny as they were irrelevant.

In my opinion the writer has too much focus on the everyday chores that the boys keep busy with, like building the shelters and not letting the fire signal out. After all, the book has many interesting subjects for the author to play around with. One of them comes up more frequently than any other: a mysterious beast which a couple of the boys claim to have seen. The reader wants to find out what kind of creature the beast is in the end but it turns out to be a work of the boys’ own imagination.

As I spent a little bit of my time to think I noticed a few metaphors in the book. Firstly I’d like to mention the imaginary beast which to me reflects the savage in every one of us humans. It’s the fear and the devil inside. When the boys were left by themselves for too long, it began to dominate them.

Other clear reflections of the real world were the characters themselves. There’s the main character Ralph, who’s chosen to be the Chief of the island. Ralph represents the democracy and discipline. On the opposite side standing for the violence and wildness is Jack, the becoming enemy of Ralph. Piggy is a fat, bullied boy who desperately tries to be the voice of reason. Together the boys sort of form a tiny society.

Bullying is also one matter that’s brought up quite often in the book. Piggy, who seems to be the smartest boy in the bunch and who, at least from my point of view, is the most likeable and sympathetic character, is bullied throughout the book. It looks to me that the author is expressing how too often the bullied people are actually the bravest or the most intelligent. And most of all it’s wrong and no good will come from it. This fact can be seen in the end of the book most clearly.

Confused by the name of the book, I was compelled to do my research. It turns out that the name ”Lord of the flies” is a reference directly to another name of Satan in Hebrew. This brings us back to the beast which has a huge role in the book. I actually found an interesting review about the book in which the writer, ”Pii” AKA Anni Vuorinen, draws a line from the devilish beast to the religion. She also discovered some symbolics that completely passed my thoughts, for instance the conch being a symbol of civilisation.

To sum up, I think the book was sadly a bit of a dull experience but it had some wonderful but sometimes brutal thoughts and arguments in it. Nevertheless I’m happy to have finally read it. No regrets, as I often like to say!
Melina Ojala

 

SOURCES:

http://maailmanaareen.blogspot.fi/2012/09/karpasten-herra.html

http://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%A4rp%C3%A4sten_herra

Leave a Comment

Filed under Novels, Yleinen