Author Archives: viljatuuliylikoski

Bridget Jones’s Diary

Helen Fielding started writing the story of Bridget Jones, a thirty-something single woman living in London, as a column in the magazine ”The Independent” in 1995. After that Bridget’s charming character has demanded a wider audience; Fielding has published three books starring her unconventional heroine and two of them have been adapted for the big screen with top actors such as Renée Zellweger, Hugh Grant and Colin Firth. The succes was predictable since Bridget Jones is, without a doubt, the queen of all single women. And probably single men too.
The book I will be reviewing is ”Bridget Jones’s Diary”, but I’ll say a few words about the franchise as a whole.

You could say ”Bridget Jones’s Diary” is ”Pride and Prejudice” adapted to the modern day. Helen Fielding has openly admitted that she ”stole” the plot from Jane Austen, but she doesn’t think Austen will mind (since she happens to be dead).
Many of the characters are actually modern versions of the characters from PaP; Bridget Jones, as the protagonist, is obviously Elizabeth Bennet; Bridget’s main love interest Mark Darcy is Mr. Darcy; her slimy boss Daniel Cleaver is Wickham; and her parents are Mr. And Mrs. Bennet, even though Bridget’s mum Pamela’s storyline also has shades of Elizabeth Bennet’s little sister Lydia’s story.
Bridget, as a character, differs very much from Elizabeth. The protagonist of the Jane Austen novel is more sensible and less lovesick than Bridget, whereas the latter spends her time reading books about self-growth, getting along with men and getting by without men, smoking cigarettes, obsessing over her boss, drinking, discussing relationships with her friends and counting calories. Still Bridget and Elizabeth get thrown in similar situations with absolutely impossible mother (”Bridget, I’m not listening to any more of this. Auntie Una was just saying the other day: if you’d had something a bit more bright and cheerful on at the turkey curry buffet Mark Darcy might have shown a bit more interest. Nobody wants a girlfriend who wanders round looking like someone from Auschwitz, darling”), misleading men and runaway family members.
Bridget also loves ”Pride and Prejudice” and is in love with Mr. Darcy. It’s kind of amusing, when you remember that in the filmatization of the novel Bridget’s love interest is played by Colin Firth, who also plays Mr. Darcy in the TV-serie adaption of the Jane Austen novel (Colin Firth is THE Mr. Darcy and I know most of people will agree with me on this).

Bridget’s friends, mostly Jude, Sharon and Tom, are a big part of the story. Each of them have their own problems when it comes to romance, but they are always ready to support each other and criticise their boyfriends. Actually they all have a really good reason to blame them since somehow they have successed to attract the worst kind of men one can possibly find. For example, Jude’s boyfriend (named ”Vile Richard” by the friend group) has bad commitment issues and makes poor Jude believe that she’s the one being co-dependent and needy for wanting simple things such as a shared holiday with her boyfriend. Other boyfriends aren’t much better and that sort of makes you think about the whole picture. I understand that this is supposed to be a satirised version of single life in London, but is it acceptable in the name of satire that none of Bridget’s friends end up having a healthy relationship by the end of the first book?

The book is written in a shape of a diary, as you can tell from the title. Bridget is mostly a reliable narrator but she doesn’t always understand everything that’s going on even though the reader will understand it all.
Often there is a small statistics of Bridget’s ”accomplishments” in the beginning of the diary entries. Usually they contain Bridget’s current weight, alcohol units of the day, cigarettes she has smoked and something extra. For example: ”9st 1, alcohol units 0, cigarettes 1/2 (fat chance of any more), calories: God knows, minutes spent wanting to kill mother 188 (conservative estimate)”.
Here is one of the biggest problems I have with this book; I understand that women have a huge pressure to look thin, but in what world a woman who weighs 9 stones (about 57 kilos) is fat? I would accept it if it was all in Bridget’s head, but there are some snarks about her informed chubbiness. Is she really, really short of what am I missing here?

As I have probably made clear, I’m familiar with the Bridget Jones franchise, but I haven’t read this book in English before. It was nice to read it in the original language. It was delightfully ”British”, but not in a snobbish way. Many things made more sense when not translated, even thought the Finnish translator had done a great job with this book the first time I read it.
I really like this book and I adore Bridget’s character. This diary is the Bible of all the single people and even thought it may sound weird, Bridget is a suprisingly good role model.
She makes lots of mistakes and is often mislead. For example, when she’s with Daniel Cleaver, who is cheating on her: Even the reader may think that Bridget’s the stupid one, that she should have seen that coming. Then we stop to think about it and we see that Daniel is the one who is doing the wrong thing. Bridget has done nothing wrong. It’s easy to think a similar situation from your own life and understand that you did nothing wrong. People are allowed to make mistakes.
Bridget isn’t gloriously beautiful. She drinks way too much and smokes like a chimney. She’s reckless and not the most clever woman you’ll ever meet. That’s why it’s so easy for us to see ourselves in her; she’s flawed in and out.
It’s good that we see ourselves in her, since she’s, despite or because of all her flaws, absolutely loveable.

”Oh my God. Just took lid off casserole to remove carcasses. Soup is bright blue.”
– poor Bridget trying to cook

Leave a Comment

Filed under Novels, Yleinen

Modern Family

”When life gives you lemonade, make lemons. Life will be all like ’WHAAAT?’” – Phil Dunphy

There was a time when me and my family spent our nights scrolling down Netflix in hope of finding something decent to watch, but this one time there was a show that caught our eye. That show was Modern Family. From the first minutes I was completely hooked.

Modern Family is a situational comedy created by Christopher Lloyd and Steven Levitan. It centers around the lives of three families. Jay Pritchett is the father of Claire and Mitchell, who both have families on their own. Claire is married to Phil Dunphy and has three children, Mitchell has a daughter with his partner (and later on husband) Cameron. After Jay divorced his first wife, he married a much younger woman, Gloria, who has a son named Manny. Later Jay and Gloria also have a baby together. Are you confused already? Good.
We occasionally get a closer look of each family members thoughts through interviews in which they express their thoughts and motives. The show’s premise might sound a little clumsy, but trust me, it works.

The cast of Modern Family is full of amazing actors like Ty Burrell, Ed O’Neill, Eric Stonestreet and Sofia Vergara. The show may sound unoriginal at first, especially the Dunphy family reminds us of a typical sitcom family. The family seems to be full of stereotypes; the nagging mother (Claire), the dad who acts like a child (Phil), the nerdy daughter (Alex), the dumb but pretty daughter (Haley) and the son, who is not the brightest crayon in the box either (Luke). We have seen them all before, but when the character development marches on we will notice, that they don’t stay as two-dimensional caricatures.

The characters are the best part of the series. Everyone is sometimes, if not most of the time, likeable and every character has a different kind of relationship with each member of the extended family. The relationships are the other strong point; all three main couples are able to be sickeningly sweet. There are lots of fights in every relationship, but the main reason for that is the fact that in this show opposites have attracted a little too much.
Gloria is very hot-headed and passionate, whereas Jay is calm, stubborn and cranky. Phil loves a good laugh and wants to be a ”cool dad”, but Claire is very strict, obsessive and perfectionistic. Mitchell shares his sister’s perfectionism and is kind of a snob. He’s a no-nonsense kind of lawyer and a polar opposite for Cameron who is very theatrical and flamboyant farmboy.
Also non-romantic relationships are adorable. There is sibling rivalry, ”daddy issues” and absolutely fantastic friendships.

Some people have criticized Modern Family’s casting for being stunningly white. I agree that there certainly should be more people of colour, but otherwise I applaud some of the diversity of this show. It has a great portrayal for interracial and same-sex relationships.
Of course I still have to complain about a few things. One of the problems with the representation in this show is the lack of on-screen affection between Jay & Gloria and Mitchell & Cameron. Claire and Phil get to have full-blown make out sessions and open talks about their sex life, whereas Jay and Gloria have had only a couple of scenes like that. They have gotten better though. With Mitch and Cam it gets nearly absurd; four kisses within the whole series.
Still I’m happy that a mainstream comedy show like Modern Family has two gay characters in the main cast, since it’s really important for the LGBT+ community to be representated this way in television; as normal people who can love and raise children. Some gay teenagers have got the courage to come out to their families after watching Modern Family with them, so representation matters.

The humour is glorious, especially on the first season. There are running jokes, like Phil stumbling in the same loose step over and over and saying that he is going to fix it (but he never does), or that Mitchell is terrified of birds.
There is usually a pun or a culture reference in the episode title (few examples ”A Hard Jay’s Night”, ”Strangers on a Treadmill” and ”Run for Your Wife”). Jokes in the series sound entertainingly spontanious. I think the humour in this show is really genuine and fresh.

At the end of an episode there is often a clever and insightful life lesson. Instead of sticking some kind of message down your throat they really teach you something important. My favourite life lessons from Modern Family are probably ”People are who they are, give or take fifteen percent. That’s how much people can change if they really want to”, ”The dreamers need the realists to keep them from soaring too close to the sun. And the realists? Well, without the dreamers, they might not ever get off the ground” and ”Ninety percent of being a dad is just showing up”.
Modern Family goes through some important themes. It shows how important it is to be supported by your family and how everyone has the right to be weak sometimes. It teaches us about how people will usually be able to grow, at least a tiny bit. Modern Family makes you laugh but it will also bring tears to your eyes, especially when something the character’s feeling hits you a little too close to the home. Many fans were teary eyed when Phil cried about his memories with his mother when she had just died, or when Mitchell and Jay had a fight about Jay’s attitude towards Mitchell’s upcoming wedding, or when Alex cried from relief when somebody finally understood how much pressure she was putting on herself.
You get really attached to these characters. In a weird way they become a part of your family.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Yleinen