Author Archives: melinaojala

Lord of the flies

William Golding, 1954

 

This is a book about a group of schoolboys wrecked in an unhabited, tropical island, who struggle trying to survive while there’s no rescuer in sight. But at the same time it’s a book about society, war, democracy, autocracy, adulthood, violence and human nature. With all these issues on the table, it is intangible how William Golding, a Nobel Prize-winning English author, has managed to deal with them with such lightness and simplicity.

It’s the age of the Second World War. The world is in chaos but it’s sincerely silent and tranquil on the island. The only exception in the serenity are the lost schoolboys who landed there due to an airplane accident. One of the boys, by the name of Ralph, finds a pure white conch and decides to summon all the boys to an assembly. Soon he’s chosen to be the Chief. Things start well as the children work devotedly together, but as the time flies, some boys begin to disagree on some shared rules. Conflicts are born, fear grows and on every one’s mind is a doubt if they’ll ever get back home again.

First a few words about the plot. I hadn’t heard much about it in advance though Lord of the Flies is a well-known peace of literature. Therefore I expected to be excited and surprised by the twists and turns of the storyline. Instead I was to find myself yawning in a neverending state of boredom – at least it felt like it!

I was greatly disappointed in the events of this book which roughly didn’t even exist. Where the boys were described arguing or eating or bathing or dreaming, I was left to long for more action. On the other hand the book was filled with talented narration and description of the milieu. Unfortunately my linguistic talents of English weren’t quite enough to grasp that (And the time was too short for using the dictionary with so many difficult words in a row!) Still, it’s never a good sign if one has to force herself to reading a book.

Golding’s writing is polished and finely tuned. Particularly impressing were the lines of the boys. The children spoke very plainly and abruptly which was convincing but also frustrating for it made the story a lot harder to follow. Although I have to admit that the confusingly random and sudden comments were as funny as they were irrelevant.

In my opinion the writer has too much focus on the everyday chores that the boys keep busy with, like building the shelters and not letting the fire signal out. After all, the book has many interesting subjects for the author to play around with. One of them comes up more frequently than any other: a mysterious beast which a couple of the boys claim to have seen. The reader wants to find out what kind of creature the beast is in the end but it turns out to be a work of the boys’ own imagination.

As I spent a little bit of my time to think I noticed a few metaphors in the book. Firstly I’d like to mention the imaginary beast which to me reflects the savage in every one of us humans. It’s the fear and the devil inside. When the boys were left by themselves for too long, it began to dominate them.

Other clear reflections of the real world were the characters themselves. There’s the main character Ralph, who’s chosen to be the Chief of the island. Ralph represents the democracy and discipline. On the opposite side standing for the violence and wildness is Jack, the becoming enemy of Ralph. Piggy is a fat, bullied boy who desperately tries to be the voice of reason. Together the boys sort of form a tiny society.

Bullying is also one matter that’s brought up quite often in the book. Piggy, who seems to be the smartest boy in the bunch and who, at least from my point of view, is the most likeable and sympathetic character, is bullied throughout the book. It looks to me that the author is expressing how too often the bullied people are actually the bravest or the most intelligent. And most of all it’s wrong and no good will come from it. This fact can be seen in the end of the book most clearly.

Confused by the name of the book, I was compelled to do my research. It turns out that the name ”Lord of the flies” is a reference directly to another name of Satan in Hebrew. This brings us back to the beast which has a huge role in the book. I actually found an interesting review about the book in which the writer, ”Pii” AKA Anni Vuorinen, draws a line from the devilish beast to the religion. She also discovered some symbolics that completely passed my thoughts, for instance the conch being a symbol of civilisation.

To sum up, I think the book was sadly a bit of a dull experience but it had some wonderful but sometimes brutal thoughts and arguments in it. Nevertheless I’m happy to have finally read it. No regrets, as I often like to say!
Melina Ojala

 

SOURCES:

http://maailmanaareen.blogspot.fi/2012/09/karpasten-herra.html

http://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%A4rp%C3%A4sten_herra

Leave a Comment

Filed under Novels, Yleinen

Maa johon en kuulu (The world where I don’t belong)

PLAY REVIEW

Director: Anne Mäkinen

Written by the working group of the project Tuulta purjeisiin

 

One free evening of mine I accidentally came across this play. For a long time I had been tempted to go and watch it. The idea of it was so interesting and I had heard so many praises about it that I knew I had to see it. Fortunately I did.

The basic idea is simple but brilliant: the script is written by a group of young people involved in this project, Tuulta purjeisiin. The project is for unemployed young adults who in some way or another need guiding in their lives (http://www.pori.fi/kulttuuri/tuultapurjeisiin-hanke.html). The script consists of stories from their own lives. The fascinating part is that an actor never performed in his own story.

Because of the extremely different kinds of stories in the play, the plot was not unambiguous. However there were some clear unifying factors between the scenes. There was some kind of a crisis in every story and all of them contained an attempt to criticize the society for the people’s unequal chances in succeeding in life which depend so strongly on the basis in which a person is born. I personally think they managed to share the thought very well. The crises in the stories varied between drug addictions, depressions, severe harassments and many other sad incidents.

Some stories stood out more than the others. The ones that got stuck in my head were Laura’s and Kaneli’s stories.

Laura was a sweet little girl whose parents got separated and her dear dad left her alone with her irresponsible mother. Six months later the dad was found dead lying under a tree. This story really touched me deeply because I couldn’t imagine losing my own dad in an accident. But this made me realise that world is a cruel place and these kinds of things can happen to anyone, anytime.

Kaneli, on the other hand, was a reckless rebel who just had a bad luck – and company. She had a habit of getting in strangers’ cars during a party night. Because of that habit, she unfortunately had to experience for instance a violent car crash and a ruthless rape. I think this was the most outrageous story of them all. I had a hard time trying to internalize that it is a true story, meaning that it actually happened to one of these amazing actors, these normal people with vulnerable minds.

Though the play was filled with sad storys, it had glimpses of humour here and there. I was especially delighted by the scene, where the actors were impersonating souls (but actually looked more like sperm cells!) in a programme called Soul of Finland. They were dealt different features like prizes even though they were something like ”drinking problem” and ”mentally ill parents”.

Focusing also on the technical aspect of the play, I noticed that the costumes of the actors were remarkably plain but effective. They were wearing only pure white clothes. This way they all seemed so innocent and equal. The lights were inventive and handled professionally. The set was almost nonexistent, but more would have been unnecessary. There was just the right amount of everything.

One thing that I realised as late as after the show was the fact, that the play consisted almost entirely of monologues. That sounds very boring, but I didn’t even notice it since the storyline was so intriguing all the time. It didn’t bother a bit.

The acting was suprisingly high quality considering the backgrounds of the actors and actresses. I know from experience that it isn’t easy in any way to express and empathise those kinds of heavy emotions, and that’s the thing I valued the most in this performance. It fealt real in my heart. It made me laugh and cry and fear many times. And most of all it made me think.

 

Lähteet:
http://www.pori.fi/kulttuuri/tuultapurjeisiin-hanke.html

Leave a Comment

Filed under Films / theatre