Author Archives: annihellman

Coraline

 

Coraline is a fast pace, exciting and timeless fantasy novel written by Neil Gaiman in 2002. It has been acclaimed by many and has also won the top place on several ”Best Book”-lists. It’s popularity raised even more as it was adapted into animation in 2009. Coraline is relatively new novel even though it very much seems like an old classic for younger readers – despite modern technology is somewhat present in this book, such as television and computer are mentioned. However, I think that Coraline’s adventures are so peculiar that they aren’t bound with any period of time.

 

Coraline tells about a girl, after whom the book is entitled, who loves to explore and whose family has just moved to an old house devided into four apartments. On a rainy day, Coraline’s not allowed to play outside so she starts to explore the house instead. She counts all the doors, since her father advised her to. She finds a locked door which begins to interest her but as Coraline’s mother unlocks it, she sees that there’s only a brick wall behind. This doesn’t however kill her interest in it and as the story proceeds, Coraline finds that the brick wall has disappeared one night and there’s a long dark corridor opening in front of her. At the end of the corridor there’s another door which leads to a house, copy of her real home though not exactly identical – everything’s a tad bit better, or so does she think at first. Coraline meets her other mother and her other father who are like parents she has dreamed of. However, there’s a slite curiosity in her other parents – they have buttons sewn to their eyes. The other parents want Coraline to live with them instead of her real parents and sew buttons to her eyes as well. Coraline challanges the other mother to play a game in which Coraline has to find the lost souls of her parents or else she’ll lose her own soul to her other mother. But since the other mother is cruel and loves to win, she tries to cheat. Thus Coraline goes through a battle agains her and is confronted with challanges.

”Flee, while there’s still air in your lungs and blood in your vains and warmth in your heart. Flee while you still have your mind and soul.”

Who or more alarmingly what the other mother actually is, stays as a mystery. Why does she exist? Furthermore, the question why there is such a place in general where she lives, wont be solved.

The narrator in this book is non-participant and limited to the protagonist’s perspective. However, it doesn’t describe Coraline’s feelings and thoughts in detail or regard them as a crusial piece of information. This begs a question whether Coraline is actually so one-dimentional or is this just due to the minimalistic amount of images created from Coraline’s internal dynamics. This is probably why there wasn’t really a character I would’ve identified with.

Given the fact that the narrator makes Coraline maybe a bit ambiguous, the protagonist seems very baffled by the world around her; she doesn’t quite understand it but surprisingly she just acknowledges the weird occasions she experiences but never questions them outloud or demand anwers. Coraline is remote from other people and they all seem to live in their own worlds inside their heads; they’re isolated from each other – not concretely but as far as communication is concerned. Coraline asks something from her mother, for instance, but never gets an answer for the question she presented or, at least, nobody bothers to answer. This may cause annoyance among readers.

Although Coraline is a bit naive, she’s also very clever and I feel like sometimes the reason why she doesn’t bother to question things is just because she has more interesting things to do and see than look for answers for her astonishment from the people around her who probably don’t understand them either. Coraline turns out to very be brave for her age and can push herself to her limits when needed. In this sense, Coraline evolves as the story proceeds.

Although the book is pretty much a one-man show of Coralines, there’s also another character, a mysterious black cat, which involves her adventures. The cat, which I personally adored, is like Coraline’s helper; it advices her (yes, the cat can speak when it’s on ”the other side” of the house) and I feel like it supports her to be brave. It has always something unpredictable to say and kinda has its own laws – it may suddently disappear or emerge out of nowhere.

The book has a simple and clear storyline, and in my opinion, written only to be told, shared to the readers and nothing more. It has no filling. I was longing for the situations to be described and made more interesting through detailed text. Though, these aspects do sometimes occure but mostly when the book is alredy approaching it’s end. Events in this book are followed one after the other in a continuos pace. The story proceeds quickly and smoothly, but in my opinion, that sacrifices the aspects which bring dimension to the story, or else, the ever so unique and fascinating story stays muted and doesn’t really reach the point of greatness it has the potential for.

Coraline is an easy read since it’s for younger readers. Therefore, even though I’m tempted to say it was a bit of a disappointment, the not so winding language is expected – though I didn’t think it was going to be this easy. Also, books which evoke a wide spectrum of feelings and are multidimensional are usually the ones I prefer, but Coraline sadly didn’t have those aspects. The library didn’t have the books available I so wanted to read and some of the authors I was interested in were simply missing, such as Fitzgerald, Lockhart and Doerr. But if you’re looking for a thrilling, adventurous novel just to past the time, then Coraline could be for you. It’s also very likely to forgot that you’re reading this novel in english.

Leave a Comment

Filed under arvosteltu, Novels, Yleinen

The Tree of Life

Written and directed by Terrence Malick, The Tree of Life got its premiere in 2011. It shares opinions since it certaintly is something you haven’t seen before (unless you have actually seen it…). The Tree of Life could be best descriped as an ambiguous poem – in all its simplicity.

 

All the actors fit to their roles seamlessly. The film, starring Brad Pitt, Jessica Chastain and Hunter McCracken, reaches its high quality standards with acting that looks effortless and realistic.

The plot is predominantly simple but needs a bit of concentration to be noticed and therefore watching the film for the second time might be crucial for greater experience and understandment. Basically The Tree of Life is a story about Jack O’Brian’s biography and the film starts with his brother’s death. Alongside it’s about a mother who questions her loss and the meaning of God and his powers. The reason for her son’s death isn’t told but the plot isn’t really depending on it. In my opinion, if the cause of his death had been revealed, the film would’ve lost it’s appealing obscurity. Although this film contains spiritual aspects, it also brings up its views through science. Since this film talks about life in general, I see the spirituality just as another perspective it gives about life.

In its entirety, the film talks nonverbally about emergence and meaning of life. It tells a story about a family but in fact, it tells a story about life through the feelings and questions the family brings to the viewer. The subject might sound too big to be grasped by a film but I would say The Tree of Life isn’t trying to be someone’s epiphany, it just wants to be beautiful.

The main characher, Jack, seems to be a succesfull man who begins to think about the world from a different perspective after his brother’s death which takes place when Jack’s an adult living his life in a buisness world. Like a lost soul, he starts to see memories from his childhood and understands his lost connection with nature. The film dives into the time when Jack was a child. He’s the eldest son and a brother of two. Jack has a hard and remote relationship with his authoritative father and he questions his motives – and in general, his existence. Jack feels hate towards his father but at the same time he seems sad about the tension he feels around him.

Mr. O’Brien, Jack’s father, is a seething personality and represents nature. However, despite his cold behaviour, I feel like he’s very vulnerable and lonely denying his need for love. Good people give love but he thinks that being good isn’t something you want to achieve if success is your goal. Others are not allowed to say anything against him. Even though he’s authoritarian, the anger is more a defensive way to protect his self-esteem. After the death of his son he begins to understand: ’’I made him feel shame. My shame.’’ I think the shame he mentiones had always been there, hidden, it had been tried to be covered by anger and success.

As the story of Jack’s childhood proceeds, Mr. O’Brien admits he has been a little tough for Jack and after he experiences the low-point of his career he surrenders: ’’I wanted to be loved because I was great. –Now I’m nothing. I lived in shame. I dishonored it all. And didn’t notice the glory.’’

At the beginning of the film, Mrs. O’Brian says ”—there’s two ways through life. The way of nature…and the way of grace.” Grace is accepting and good whereas nature is selfish, dissatisfied and dominant. These two opposite ways are brought up in the film through Jack’s parents’ personalities. His mother is caring, representing grace. She understands her sons but also loves her husband. She follows ’’the way of grace’’ and thus she accepts him. Along the film, Mrs. O’Brian undergoes the fact that one of her sons has died, but from the perspective of her three son’s childhood she has the role of teaching, loving and understanding.

I think that Jack’s parents have a distrackting effect on him. Which way should he follow? This thought could be the meaning of the line Jack has: ’’Father. Mother. Always you wrestle inside me. Always you will.’’

When digged deeper, The Tree of Life is a multidimentional film telling many stories. The stories are found right from the core of life that they might seem indistinguishable –eternity or change, understandment, brotherhood and love. The film bounds these stories together with the process of accepting. The viewer sees this through memory-like events from Jack’s perspective, his thoughts and feelings. However, the other characters also have an influence on this, especially Jack’s mother.

The lines in this film are very short but no more is needed. They complete the extremely skillful camerawork which is brought to life with enchanting music. The Tree of Life is pure but strong, clean but natural. The colours are subtle but that makes it intriguing and an enormous joy to watch. The film has managed to create 1950’s atmosphere to Jack’s memories but it has not been done too obvious since the colour scheme is very earthy and continuous throughout the film. Due to the minimalistic amount of text, some facts were hidden and relying on the viewer’s interpretations – and that’s why also my point of view of this film is just one among the others.

The lighting is very important in this film. For instance, the rays of light and the peeking Sun brings the memory-like feel to the scenes. In all its naturalness, this film does have special effects. When the film goes through the origin and development of life, special effects are obviously needed. Some of them are too much for my taste – the dinosaurs and individual cells or bacteria shown brake the earthy appearance of this film.

 

The Tree of Life is one of my favourite films but I do understand that some people don’t find it interesting. It doesn’t really have a clear plot, in a way you can see in other films, or surprising twists but I just enjoy the beauty it has. I’m also very pleased to see a film that gives you the opportunity for your own interpretation.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Films / theatre