Author Archives: annamari

Chocolat

A beautiful movie tells about a woman who had ended up to a little French village. Vianne Rocher (Juliette Binoche) initiates a chocolate shop with her only daughter but the kind-hearted idea is not regarded as so sweet. Opening a chocolate shop just during the fasting result in reprehension but the originator shows how strong and obstinate a single lady can be.

Juliette Binoche perform her part very well managing to bring the right feeling to the screen. Even if Vianne Rocher is a careful mother she can also be a seductive beauty who gets every man on tiptoes. Actually she has a total knowledge of people`s thoughts and her serenity calms mostly dramatic movie. Of course a woman like this needs a tiny adventure and soon a handsome Rom (Jonny Depp) leashes his boat to a dock  but the residents of the village don`t accept that. Naturally there is some mystics in the stoned streets of French villages and in spite of the residents` negative feelings there are situations seasoned with romantic in for.

Romantic nights are full of playing guitar in silence and dancing accompanied by violins. In my opinion the soundtrack of the movie is remarkably emotional and makes spectators wondering theirselves into the situations of the movie. In its entirety the music of the film is quite straightforward but after all it fills its part better than just aptly.

At the same time the film gives an opportunity to see how a child have to conform to adults` everyday life. Rocher`s daughter Anouk (Victoire Thivisol) have to suffer from loneliness when her mother is annoying the residents of the village. I reckon that the film aims to point out social disadvantages. What is more in the end of the movie prevalent weird feeling of the village begins to disappear –thanks to Vianne Rocher. The story tells that closed-mindedness can be just a way to escape from reality.

Above all   the execution of the film is very versatile and it doesn`t neither give way for monotonousness nor excessive exaggeration of dramatic. The effects are tranquil even if the film is production of the nineteenth century. After the credits have ended up long ago a spectator will immerse into the fascinating feeling of the movie for hours with chocolate box hoping that the story would continue eternally but that is because the film has a soothing effect. Thus the film is suitable as well for grown-up mind as younger viewers.

In summary the `Chocolat` can be seen as a contention to individual freedom and to methods of our society. Anyway the film serves a pretext to curl up on the couch in a gloomy night of an autumn but of course there have to be one shameful thing in the film: You may need countless pieces of confectionery before the chocolate shop is even opened.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Films / theatre

Pure evil -or something else?

An oldish detective story lays in a bookshelf like any other book which has written almost hundred years ago. That prestigious book attracts as well younger as older readers all the more being a gloomy rescue of an autumn evenings and a sensitive breeze of a spring at the same time. Proficiency that both confuses and carries through a labyrinth of simple clues that are stashed very well. This British writer manage to entwine us with complicated but still so obvious plot –yes, of course I am talking about Agatha Christie`s writing, about Evil under the sun.

In the beginning of the book the main character, a colonist from Belgium Hercule Poirot, is typically having a holiday with a fistful of peculiar people until gloominess shows up. Characters personify persons of the real life in the sense that they have as many features and hence being careful with unreliability could be seen as the message of this book. On the other hand Christie gets an innocent person seeming like a quilty and therefore the point could be the phrase “Nothing is what it seems “. In spite of that similarity with our everyday life there is not a person to whose status a reader can easily fit oneself and that is how Christie gets a reader start to ponder the crime like he would be all-seeing and then attractiveness of the plot  abides. Without this Poirot`s explanation in the end could feel too confusing namely the story is not effortless to understand.

In the case that you have read many stories of Christie and because of similarity of the characters this story starts to feel too much worn out is the milieu compensatory. Who does not want to have breakfast in bed circled with blue water areas and green hills? The writer makes use of weather phenomena; When it is an ordinary day the sun is shining but when sunshine is over the murderer is behind unsuspecting visitor`s back and this is the way that turns readers into right frequency. This is a slightly flat way of writing but on account of this means the reader can catch the plot quickly.

Beautiful use of language confirms mysterious sensibility of the book. British English is even more than just an experience intrinsically. Sometimes you can notice how Christie has hidden into a one word a big clue. Actually it is not hidden but you did not think it could be remarkable and thus this book teaches also vigilance. Which comes to the name of the book it expresses very well Christie`s dramatic style although serenity of landscape moderates it and there is suitably drops of drama in the story. In the beginning the story does not  seem to flare up like sparkling wine but as rapidly as a child can fall asleep you can notice that there is drama like in a soap opera.

All in all Evil under the sun does not differ much from other Christie`s stories but nevertheless this writing belongs to a collection in which the main point is an equivalent clue which so easily deceives you time after another. I think Evil under the sun is much more than just evil. It shows how ornate a story could be without too many ways of influencing. Once in a while you can long for something new, providing that you have read other writings, so you have to focus on following clues like you were a real detective. Fortunately this may improve you as a reader. But why should this book be read? The way of spelling is above all ingenious and this kind of way have neither before nor after seen. In my opinion never have been written a book which does not teach anything.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Novels